Posted: Oct 08, 2010 4:37 pm
LIFE wrote:Paul Almond wrote:And of course, I am discussing a very silly idea here as if it is sensible - and I want to be very clear that I think it is not sensible.
Since you made that remark in a reply to Teuton I'm unsure whether you find my objection not sensible or if it was indeed only addressing his response? You seem to think that miscommunication between theists/atheists is a non-issue?I don't have a problem understanding you since we seem to be on the same page, I'm rather addressing "leaks" in communication between people who hold opposing views if that makes sense.
I mean that the idea of a god existing is not sensible: I am not saying that anything said by anyone here is not sensible. I disagree with Teuton about whether non-spatial things can be coherent. As far as I am concerned, non-spatial and non-temporal things can exist in principle without causing me philosophical issues; however, that is just a disagreement and I am not saying that anyone is not being sensible.