Posted: Oct 06, 2017 10:42 am
jamest wrote:Firstly, the purpose of my post was to refute what Rumraket stated, which it does because the only evidence/knowledge we have of the world is via observation.
No, it doesn't refute it at all. You are confusing what happens, with how we come to know what happens.
There's no way for you to prove that we have to observe things, in order for them to exist.
How utterly ironic to hear this kind of positivist crapy from a purported idealist.
