Posted: Nov 20, 2019 5:04 am
Scott Mayers wrote:The original need for the peer review is obsolete when we have the internet that should appeal to ALL people to participate. The only prior reason for going through particular prescreening was due to limits of space in publications. The referee system needs to be overthrown.
So you say.
Scott Mayers wrote:I don't believe that it is wise to point out particular people or other sites, etc. If and where I get censored, I stop going to those places and preferentially like to have any material that I wrote on those sites to be kept wholesale or deleted wholesale. The only way I can overcome this is with power that I don't have access to.
Well, poor little you. We have the referee system needing to be overthrown, and now you're complaining about the limitations of the "internet thread publication" model. There are vanity presses you can send your stuff to if you want it published indelibly.
Don't you see that the problem you face is not really everyone else's problem?