Posted: Jul 21, 2018 5:04 pm
newolder wrote:DavidMcC wrote:newolder wrote:DavidMcC wrote:
No, but they are not the posts I was thinking of. Having said that, what they are is good examples of the kind of aggressive nonsense I have come to expect in this thread. Nowhere did I say or imply what RS assumes I did.
theropod did not post anything more to this topic until post 102. What do you mean by "RS's recent posts"?
Unfortunately, I didn't think to make a note of the post numbers, or copy them into my computer. All I remember for sure is that, yesterday, he posted that he thought there were many different imaging eye types around from which he thought that the vertebrate eye could have evolved. In other words, he was trying to imply that the vertebrate eye might have been derived from any of them, and I implied that this is false. However, today, I noticed that that entire discussion had vanished. (Which means that the mods must have removed it.)
If the only evidence you have for this is your memory then I cannot help you. I've been following this topic for many days and do not recall RS posting anything to the topic yesterday.
Welcome to the FTL cabal. You will be receiving your membership packet shortly.