Posted: Jul 24, 2018 5:00 pm
by Thomas Eshuis
DavidMcC wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:
You shouldn't do yourself down so, Sendraks.

In that context of what I wrote, this makes no sense.

DavidMcC wrote: Of course TE's posts here are irrelevant - irrelevant to the biology and evolution of the vertebrate eye -which he hasn't yet mentioned in his posts. :roll:

The same can be said about a great many posts you make but, you seem happy to argue the toss about your imagined slights and yet when faced with TE's neat dissections of the failings of your comments, his posts magically become "irrelevant."

DavidMcC wrote:Can you tell me what I said in the past that got you so angry, and siding with his irrationality?

I'm angry? :think:

Also, your responses to TE's posts are irrational, not the posts themselves.


Then stop adressing delusional straw-men and start adressing what people actually post.

DavidMcC wrote: He seems to make an effort to avoid the thread topic, as do you.

Still counterfactual and hypocritical bullshit David, no matter how many times you mindlessly regurgitate it.

DavidMcC wrote: And, in this thread at least, I never go off-topic myself

Another demonstration of profound dishonesty or delusional observations.

DavidMcC wrote:that is done by my interlocutors, who readily change the subject from the biology of the vertebrate eye. When did YOU last post on the biology of the vertebrate eye here??

When will you stop beating your wife David?

Also: The biology of the vertebrate eye