Posted: Aug 23, 2018 7:36 pm
DavidMcC wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:Dolorosa wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Yes you've repeated that baseless accusation numerous times.
Still won't magically make it true nor hide your failure to stick to the thread topic yourself.
The very first post when you return in this thread and once again your attack your interlocutors rather than discuss the topic.
Whatever his motives are, it's obvious the man has a pathological need for attention and conflict so why do people continue to encourage him? Is it a form of entertainment here? A kind of metaphorical piñata?
Not for me.
I'm hoping that either David comes to his senses or the mods uphold the FUA (no, I am not asking for David to be banned).
That is the biggest load of doodoos I've ever heard.
Since you say that just about every other post, that isn't really a high standard.
DavidMcC wrote: This is (or WAS!) my thread on the biology of the vertebrate eye, and why RD got it all wrong.
And when people corrected your claims or asked you to substantiate them, you immediately jumped to accusing them of having all manner of nefarious motives and making shit up about their posting history.
Which is itself a derailment, not to mention dishonest.
DavidMcC wrote:PS, I'm so glad that you are not calling for me to be banned. Such a relief!
It's got nothing to do with your relief and everything with your persistent need to accuse those who don't accept your assertions as wanting you to be banned.
DavidMcC wrote:Also, I think that the off-topic stuff was all started by my interlocutors, and I would have thought that was obvious.
Yes, you seem to be terminally incapable of reflecting on your own behavior and how you keep dragging threads off-topic with your incessant persecution complex.
