Posted: Mar 09, 2010 4:41 am
Between the cases of babies born with tails and babies that are born hermaphroditic, it's no wonder religious people are so damn confused! After all, those cases are rarely publicized and the surgeries to "repair the problem" is typically completed at such a young age that it soon becomes a "non-issue" and is forgotten. Parents born with hermaphroditic children are quick to decide the child's "true sex" and, again, you rarely hear stories of parents openly discussing the issue (although there are some pretty interesting documentaries out there).
It seems to me that this allows religious people to gloss over, forget, or even deny the existence of these births as found in Nature. As if that is all not strange enough, some religions decided they needed a special ceremony to perform to remove things that their God apparently screwed up when he created us all in the first place!
I can live without a tail, but I want my foreskin back -- DAMMIT! LOL ... --G
It seems to me that this allows religious people to gloss over, forget, or even deny the existence of these births as found in Nature. As if that is all not strange enough, some religions decided they needed a special ceremony to perform to remove things that their God apparently screwed up when he created us all in the first place!
I can live without a tail, but I want my foreskin back -- DAMMIT! LOL ... --G