Posted: Sep 27, 2014 8:29 am
by Fallible
I really think that someone will still not believe that someone has in fact said something, even when their very words are reproduced to be read again. That was the whole fucking point of my original post. Patriksveti was vastly overstating his case (he did it twice, actually) and using sloppy reasoning, so I challenged him to come back and support his claims. He never did. You are basically letting him off the hook of needing to support his claims by just assuming he meant something else and acting like he said that instead and going after the person who tries to pin his sloppiness down. Well done.