Posted: Jun 21, 2015 6:23 am
by Thomas Eshuis
SpeedOfSound wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
LoneWolfEburg wrote:
I don't know why I'm not homophobic. It seems understandable to me.

So, you yourself are a counter-example to your reasoning on how Darwinian organisms should feel. Furthermore, since a lot of people are not homophobic, you can't be said to represent an extremely unique anomaly in this regard. Consequently, it appears that your initial premises are flawed, and Darwinian organisms, for good or for ill, do not operate the way you assume them to - not always, at least.

That's the mystery in my mind - why everybody isn't homophobic. Maybe some people are so sure of their sexual orientation they refuse to believe they could catch teh gay. Perhaps we're right; perhaps not.

Got's research? Take a thousand heterosexual males and place them in a booth with intimate sex scenes between males and do some measuring. Then do the same with heterosex-scenes. Are you saying that the majority will react the same way to hetero scenes as they will homosex scenes?

Or are you saying that the only thing that has a reaction in the male body to a sex scene is his dick?

You are aware of the flawed nature of phallometric testing?