Posted: May 14, 2017 10:33 am
by Keep It Real
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Keep It Real wrote: Which obvious bias are you speaking of?

The fact that these people want change their sexual orientation and are thus predisposed to look for a positive effect to the treatment.

Keep It Real wrote: The fact they were experiencing UHA? That's the qualifying criterion for the whole endeavour.

Making it a biased study.


That's like saying studies into the efficacy of cancer treatments are biased because the patients want to get well. :crazy:

Except that it isn't, as cancer isn't a harmless condition, meaning there are both people who are perfectly fine with their cancer and those who are not.
Really KIR, stopping pushing out these asinine analogies, it's not helping your case. In fact it makes you seem like a homophobe by constantly comparing homosexuality with all manner of mental and physical diseases.


Pathetic. The vast majority of cancer patients want to get well and I can't help it if your blinkered, indoctrinated, reactionary mind judges me a homophobe - that's your problem/mistake..