Posted: Oct 31, 2017 3:44 pm
by Keep It Real
SafeAsMilk wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
Cos it wasn't their 1 wife's pussy.

And why would they object to it being their 1 husband's butthole?

Cos they were prudes?

Yes, but why does 1 husband's butthole not fit into the prudish landscape while 1 wife's pussy does?

I don't know; but I know the definition of a prude and they don't like sexual deviation from monogamous heterosexual marriage of any kind. Tell me SAM; don't you think it's a little weird that they would be so "repulsed" by homosexuality and yet not repulsed by stoning adulterers? You'll be asking me next why polygamy didn't fit into the prudish landscape...they were prudes innit.