Posted: Oct 31, 2017 3:57 pm
by SafeAsMilk
Keep It Real wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:
And why would they object to it being their 1 husband's butthole?

Cos they were prudes?

Yes, but why does 1 husband's butthole not fit into the prudish landscape while 1 wife's pussy does?

I don't know;

So you don't know, but being repulsed by it is completely out of the question. Interesting.

but I know the definition of a prude and they don't like sexual deviation from monogamous heterosexual marriage of any kind.

Instead of stating the obvious over and over, you might want to consider why that is the case instead of just taking it as a given, some random belief that just popped up out of absolutely nowhere.

Tell me SAM; don't you think it's a little weird that they would be so "repulsed" by homosexuality and yet not repulsed by stoning adulterers?

Why would it be weird? Adulterers are bad by prude standards, right? So they're getting what they deserve. Also, don't know exactly what it's like over where you are, but over here there's not nearly as much concern with violence in the media as there is with sex.

You'll be asking me next why polygamy didn't fit into the prudish landscape...they were prudes innit.

Yes, but "they're a prude" is not an explanation of anything. Unless you know WHY something is prudish or it isn't, you're just saying some word over and over.