Posted: Feb 02, 2012 10:43 pm
NineBerry wrote:pinkharrier wrote:I'm still wondering what else should be covered by "denial" laws. Nineberry doesn't say.
I can tell you what IS also covered. Scott Lively's pamphlets about the Nazi movement being a homosexual movement for example falls under the same law. And what he and the like of him do in African countries (and also party in America) shows how dangerous speech alone can be.
Sounds like another reason to dump the law. Dangerous? So Turks objecting to the Armenian analysis of 1915 is dangerous? Again you stay clear of commenting on the application (or not) of "denial" laws to other events. What are you thoughts? What should be off limits because the truth is writ in stone?