rationalskepticism.org

TimONeill wrote:

james1v wrote:Latin, why? Its a dead language, supported by "the church". It points out biases by its use, it points out people who cannot get real, people who want to reinforce their culture. Why Latin?

What the fuck are you talking about?

You claim to be an historian? Did you forget the churches "inquisition/campaign against those who translated the wibble into indigenous languages?

Why the Latin? Culture? Or..Support for the dogma? Whats "Armarium Magnus" mean in your mother tongue? Why not be plain? Why use the language, the dead language, of "the church"? The language that caused so many deaths to those who had the audacity to translate it, print it and speak it in "their mother tongue". Are you seriously saying, you do not understand the issue? Really?