Posted: Dec 27, 2011 3:05 am
by Ihavenofingerprints
cjoe1994 wrote:
Ihavenofingerprints wrote:
cjoe1994 wrote:
No, just those that aren't supporting themselves or have nobody willing to support them.


Do you actually know anyone who has no-one willing to support them? If they didn't have anyone supporting them, they'd die pretty quickly anyway (because they can't help themselves). This whole argument refutes itself.

If people are truly willing to support them there can be charities for them.


THERE ARE CHARITIES FOR THEM.

IF someone can't support them-self, and they don't have anyone willing to support them. THEY WOULD DIE ANYWAY!

Why kill anyone? This is getting ridiculous.