rationalskepticism.org

cjoe1994 wrote:

Ihavenofingerprints wrote:THERE ARE CHARITIES FOR THEM.

IF someone can't support them-self, and they don't have anyone willing to support them. THEY WOULD DIE ANYWAY!

Why kill anyone? This is getting ridiculous.

They are supported by the state through taxes, not by charities.

OK, now we are getting to the bottom of this.

You are against the government giving benefits to people who can't work full time jobs or contribute to the workforce? And think that we should just kill them instead? I'm sure you'll hold the same views the day you get hit by a drunk driver and need 5 years of expensive medical treatment to have a small possibility of returning to the workforce.

Anyway...Why not just cut the tax benefits and let disabled find support elsewhere? Killing people doesn't seem to be justified here.