Posted: Apr 14, 2012 7:47 pm
by Destroyer
Cito di Pense wrote:
Destroyer wrote:
So; simplicity does rule out the possibility that anything other than chemical impulses could have possibly originated the existence of this universe; in your opinion?

Did I say anything about 'chemical impulses'? Don't put a bunch of fucking words in my mouth I never said. "Chemical impulses" is a nonsense phrase, if you are talking to a scientist. Which you are. Maybe you meant 'chemical signals'. Current models of cosmology rule out chemistry in the early phases of the universe.

What I said was that the universe started out very simply, with very simple conditions, and you could perhaps see that nothing very complex was needed to initiate these simple origins of the universe.

Do you think that anyone reading these posts are confused by the phrase 'chemical impulses' as opposed to chemical signals?

Did you, or did you not, imply to Little idiot that evolution ruled out the possibility of anything other than chemical signals being responsible for what we observe to exist??