rationalskepticism.org

ughaibu wrote:

jamest wrote:I'm obviously talking about a coherent definition acceptable to philosophers.

And as noted, this problem applies to plenty of terms. This is why we should clearly define the terms that we use in our arguments.

Did you actually read the OP? Specifically, I'm discussing the meaning/definition of existence. NOT anything else. Especially not "plenty of terms" which have no direct fucking association with 'existence'.

I respect you, so I'll spare you the frozen-badger treatment, but you really don't appear to be on form tonight.