Posted: Aug 09, 2016 12:49 pm
by SpeedOfSound
Boyle wrote:
Thommo wrote:
VazScep wrote:
Boyle wrote:At the very least, I think people should bother with enough philosophy to be able to tell when they are, in fact, bothering with philosophy.
I like to believe some people are just natural at not bothering with philosophy.


I think as a preliminary exercise we need to perform a conceptual, syntactical and hierarchical analysis of the words "believe", "natural" "bothering" and "philosophy.

Nb. also "I" "to" "some" "are" and "with".

Nah, that's analytic shit. Continental philosophy is more fun.

I don't understand this move against the analytic. Could you explain?