Posted: Dec 07, 2016 8:07 am
GrahamH wrote:This is as close as LI got to thinking outside his little box in some hundreads of posts...Little Idiot wrote:There are examples where processing is clearly different to processor. Do you say the processor stops when processing stops, in all cases? What about say a computer processor and processing for example, clearly the processor is distinct from the processing.
Alas, he failed to think it through and went back to treating the process and the processor as one and the same essential "awareness".
Sad. Very sad.
Obviously they are the same 'essential type' awareness but that is not to say they are the same.
The productive processing is dynamic and must involve change and the products are temporary transient things - while the change is in contrast to the relatively unchanging.
This is the basis of the two aspects of awareness static and dynamic which I introduced a while back.
This is the criticism I raised of your meaning of mind- you see only the dynamic active producer and miss the quiet static and fundamentally more durable aspect to the degree that you say if the dynamic stops and goes then the passive is gone too.
The static aspect is the direct line from active subjective temporal multiplicity to static non-duality. But if you don't see it, well you don't see it.
The reason why you think I treat them as one is because you can not see one of my two things.