Posted: Dec 07, 2016 10:18 am
Little Idiot wrote:GrahamH wrote:Little Idiot wrote:GrahamH wrote:This is as close as LI got to thinking outside his little box in some hundreads of posts...
Alas, he failed to think it through and went back to treating the process and the processor as one and the same essential "awareness".
Sad. Very sad.
Obviously they are the same 'essential type' awareness but that is not to say they are the same.
The productive processing is dynamic and must involve change and the products are temporary transient things - while the change is in contrast to the relatively unchanging.
This is the basis of the two aspects of awareness static and dynamic which I introduced a while back.
This is the criticism I raised of your meaning of mind- you see only the dynamic active producer and miss the quiet static and fundamentally more durable aspect to the degree that you say if the dynamic stops and goes then the passive is gone too.
The static aspect is the direct line from active subjective temporal multiplicity to static non-duality. But if you don't see it, well you don't see it.
The reason why you think I treat them as one is because you can not see one of my two things.
What a croc of shit.
Translation - that idea is different to mine.
No, it really is a load of balls LI, and if I could see either one of your two 'things' I'd suggest strangulation as the cause. You nearly had it with the processor/processing analogy but we see now that was a temporary aberration.
Repeat after me, "I am aware of something, therefore I must reify awareness." and bang that rubber bible firmly onto your forehead.
