Posted: Dec 07, 2016 12:58 pm
Little Idiot wrote:
Exactly which evidence is it that shows 'conscious awareness is solely a product of the physical processes going on in a brain and that awareness doesn't continue after death'.
See, it is easy to see why you're so muddled and going so wrong in your thinking, when you conflate two separate claims into one and also make one claim into proving a negative which you should know by now, is a fundamental error on your part.
You need to separate these out into two positive claims.
Claim one - 'conscious awareness is a product of the physical processes - this can be evidenced by my mallet experiment. The physical processes cease, the outputs of conscious awareness that we can detect cease.
Claim two - Awareness continues after death - please provide evidence to support this claim.
All you can do, rationally, is to provide evidence to support a claim. If you can't support a claim, then there is no requirement on anyone to "disprove it" (because you don't prove negatives), it is simply the case that the claim is unsupported. Unsupported or unsupportable claims get discarded because, well, you're wasting you time on them as they'll take you nowhere.