Posted: Feb 18, 2017 12:36 pm
by DavidMcC
archibald wrote:
romansh wrote:
romansh wrote:
scott1328 wrote:Well I am glad a moderator finally stepped in and put a stop to archibalds 36 hours and11 pages of insults, lies, misrepresentation, and generally assholish behavior.

Well I am puzzled by archi's behaviour. I will press him on that, should he return from his suspension.
But having said that he could not have done otherwise.

What really surprised me Archi was that your recent interaction with Graham was totally consistent with you believing Graham had free will. Now I understand that you could not do otherwise, but why would the interaction look like from the outside that you thought Graham could do otherwise?

Just curious.

Pretty much what others have said. Taking the view that people have not got free will does not seem to mean that I can easily stop adopting the Intentional Stance, unfortunately, yet. :)

So, you are hoping to achieve your ambition of not having any free will, and shunning that embarrassing intentional stance?