Posted: Oct 12, 2017 9:25 pm
John Platko wrote:
The QM MWI, branching histories are just foundation material. It's like you need to understand a bit about calculus before you really understand classical physics.
But we don't need to "really understand the physics". People don't need calculus to get the basic ideas of Newtonian physics.
http://www.physics4kids.com/files/motion_laws.html
This isn't a physics form and you aren't going to be doing any serious maths and "really understanding" QM. If someone thought that time travel would support free will the could make that case without any recourse to science. Join the dots first THEN set about justifying the dots if you can. Set out the valid logic first then set about justifying the premises. Otherwise you will be wasting your time defending premises that don't support your conclusion.