Posted: Dec 07, 2017 8:06 am
by Thommo
Absolutely, thank you for informing me that I should have simply pointed out that your argument wasn't even good enough to warrant* more than being pissed on, instead of pointing out what I perceived to be the errors it contained.

I'm sure this will lead to a much more constructive continuation. As, equally, I'm sure willfully ignoring the FUA will too.

*I've said "warrant" here, rather than be "worthy" of, I hope that's ok, as it does differ a little from the model example you put forward.