Posted: Feb 22, 2018 5:02 pm
by Sendraks
Destroyer wrote:
For example, there are many top scientists who are now familiar with my argument via private communication.


"Oh no, not another e-mail from this crackpot again" said the top scientist looking at her in-box. She was honestly boggled as to why she kept receiving the communications from this person, when what they were proposing was painfully apparent from the outset and the further messages seemed to only be repetitively asserting the same point over and over, without supply any evidence.