Posted: Feb 25, 2018 3:27 pm
Thommo wrote:
Still, although I'm critical of the content, I do applaud that you came back and answered Fallible and SAM's request with a constructive post, thanks for that.
I actually think it was a pretty good post, not because of all the messiah/Christ nonsense, but because the actual content is pretty clearly about attempting to have better conversations with people, it seems to me. He's still got the problem of seeing anyone who disagrees with him as "the unwashed masses" (which is one of his primary stumbling blocks), but overall I appreciate the sentiment. I'd be happy to have conversations with jamest where pointing out a problem with what he's said is met with understanding and thoughtful arguments informed by those objections instead of the ineffectual irrelevant counterattacks we've come to expect.