rationalskepticism.org

SafeAsMilk wrote:

John Platko wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

John Platko wrote:

That's the way Thomas Jefferson and I see it.

Well you're both guilty of assuming your preferred conclusion in the face of contradictory evidence. Not really a good way to approach much of anything.

What exactly does the word "complete" mean to you?

Ask yourself, you used it first. Be sure to keep its context.

I'm thinking you need to be a David Koresh or a Jim Jones to be a "complete asshole". The description hardly
applies to JC. And I don't recall the nuns saying anything about us having to abandon our families to be
Christian - . But I could imagine Koresh, Jones, and perhaps others misunderstanding such things.