rationalskepticism.org

jamest wrote:

Fallible wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
So that's a "no" to answering straightforward, directly relevant questions to the OP then. Got it.

You've failed for two decades, why stop now?

The difference between me and you

Oh look, the difference between me and you!

is that when it comes to serious debate you need laugh emoticons to sustain your view to uphold your identity.

...whereas you just refuse to debate. Why won't you answer questions?

I need fuck all. I stand here,

...in nothing but your underpants?

utterly alone,

Oh, sorry.

a theist hated by all other theists and atheists.

Quick, someone pipe Land of Hope and Glory in here. Hated, yeah sure. I can pretty much guarantee that you don't engender strong emotion like that from people on the internet, if those people even do hate which, by the way, I do not.

I no longer need anybody on the Earth to define me, nor (therefore) to sustain me.

I'm here to shove a frozen badger fire up...

Whatever that means. Why won't you answer questions?

It's odd, but whenever I read your posts to me all I read is piss-takes and sarcasm, not least judgements such as me being a funny small man. If there's a serious question thrown in there from time to time, then please forgive me for missing it. Or, at least, please forgive me for not giving a fuck about responding to it.

Don't demand anything from me until you treat me as your equal or better. If you don't want to do that, then don't fucking bother me at all.