Posted: Sep 08, 2018 6:31 pm
by Cito di Pense
GrahamH wrote:
The subtopic here is Graziano's Attention schema theory. He's written papers and books about it if you wanted to explore why I'm not embarrassed. It's rather good and better explained than I can manage in a few short forum posts.

I can hope that SoS has read and retained anough of it that my posts ,make sense to him even if they mean nothing to you.

So you're giving your best summary of Graziano's AS theory. Either Graziano should be embarrassed, or you should be. If having a conversation about Graziano's Attention Schema theory requires one to read the sources, instead of depending on you to give a representative summary, then that's the way it is, in this nonspecialists' discussion.