Posted: Sep 08, 2018 8:16 pm
by GrahamH
Cito di Pense wrote:
GrahamH wrote:
The subtopic here is Graziano's Attention schema theory. He's written papers and books about it if you wanted to explore why I'm not embarrassed. It's rather good and better explained than I can manage in a few short forum posts.

I can hope that SoS has read and retained anough of it that my posts ,make sense to him even if they mean nothing to you.

So you're giving your best summary of Graziano's AS theory. Either Graziano should be embarrassed, or you should be. If having a conversation about Graziano's Attention Schema theory requires one to read the sources, instead of depending on you to give a representative summary, then that's the way it is, in this nonspecialists' discussion.

I'm pointing to Graziano in reply to SoS who says he knows something about attention schema theory.
If you have a point to make about that based on knowledge and understanding of that theory let's have it. It could be interesting. Otherwise you are just embarrassing yourself.