Posted: Oct 27, 2018 9:08 am
by GrahamH
ughaibu wrote:
GrahamH wrote:. . . . which I dare say has as much merit as science requires libertarian free will.
Mind you, you still haven't offered anything resembling a lucid objection to Conway and Kochen, have you?


You are indifferent to it.
ughaibu wrote:
GrahamH wrote:Anyway, you support Conway & Kochen's theory, do you?
I can't see the relevance of this question, but as it goes, I'm pretty much indifferent to it.
Now, this is boring me, have you got an objection to their argument? If not, good night.


Your definition of free will is at odds with Conway / kochen's so you should probably stop referring to it. Be indifferent.