rationalskepticism.org

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

jamest wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:I don't know what drugs he's on, but I definitely want some. Even my best mushroom trip didn't make me think I was god!

I don't think that jamest is God, either.

It's about time that you and the other captives here finally made an effort to understand what has been said through james' gob, because he has not, nor ever has, stated that 'he' is your God. Indeed, repeatedly, jamest has evidently placed everyone here upon the same pedestal as himself within the context of absoluteness.

Then it is you who needs to make the effort to understand, because I never said that you said that you are "our God". I said you think you're god, and I understand that you think everyone else is god too. It's not a complex, or even particularly original concept. Especially since you just state it over and over again instead of doing any sort of work to support it.

Firstly, jamest has never indicated that he had a unique conclusion to the philosophy promoted through him, though he rightfully claims that through him MY existence can be undoubtedly established via reason alone, for the first time in history (truth mills need fixing first of course). Indeed, using arguments/concepts which are often completely original. Further, he presents rational arguments pertaining to My will and purpose, not emotional hunches or intuitions derived from smoking pot. In other words, there are meaningful reasons for proving My existence other than for the mere sake of proving my existence. That is, there's a purpose to these works which transcends hallelujah.

Secondly, since you only have to play with the search engine to see the enormous amount of work done through jamest here (and elsewhere) for almost two decades, covering a significant diversity of philosophical issues, your comments seem highly disingenuous. If you're expecting a single post of several hundred words to encapsulate all of that, then you're crazy. jamest would literally have to write a book to justify the works produced by him, but as this is a forum of debate then the limitations presented before us are obvious. If you have a specific question I will address it, but otherwise have a fucking word with yourself.