Posted: Mar 19, 2019 2:47 am
by SafeAsMilk
jamest wrote:
I do what I do because of its shock value, with the hope that it will make the responder THINK.

Either the technique sucks, or you suck at it, because it never works. I can pretty much guarantee you've never actually shocked anyone into thinking more deeply about anything you've said, because there isn't any depth to any of it.

I don't know if anyone will ever truly understand me, but the bottom line is that you cannot judge me until you comprehend where I'm coming from, because I'm certainly not coming from the same gaff as anyone here.

Everyone gets you just fine. You like to babble about nothing and pretend it's some grand philosophy. You don't even seem to understand that you aren't saying anything, because you never bother to really think it out, which is why you never expand on any of your "ideas", invariably abandoning them after the OP and instead spending the rest of the thread focusing on how offended you are by people's responses and how great and misunderstood you are. The only way you can frame this in a positive light, in a way that soothes your ego, is to pound your chest and declare than nobody sees what you post for what it actually is.

And the cycle will continue -- you'll ignore the truth of everything I said and focus on how much it offends you, lashing out like a wounded animal until you get too tired and run away, only to start the cycle again with another OP filled with mindless wibblings about absolutely nothing. If we're really lucky, you might complain about how you're looking for authenticity and honesty, somehow completely missing that what I've said couldn't be more honest and to the point.

In contrast, you took offense to this from Thommo:

I took offense to nothing, other than

So you took offense to something, then.