Posted: Aug 03, 2019 6:59 am
by Cito di Pense
ughaibu wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:It means that, if you can't demonstrate it, the speculation that your desired conclusion is entailed by some half-assed misrepresentation of the laws of chemistry and physics is both arrogant and silly.
Presumably you're aware that according to "actual scientists" it is impossible, even in principle, to compute all a human beings future actions? And as Zoon's theory appeals to the properties of transistors, it requires an entirely non-existent theory of semi-conductance. In short, it's science fiction. As I am pointing out that the scientists are correct but GrahamH is trying to defend Zoon, don't you think you look at little foolish attacking me rather than GrahamH?


Is Graham insisting that some conclusion is entailed by some failure of computability? No, you are. I'm widely on record as not being kind to zoon's volition of human behavior, because she implies that it might be predictable. She's got her head squarely up her arse on the question of FW.