Posted: Aug 03, 2019 2:01 pm
ughaibu wrote:
And if the conduct of science entails that the researcher must behave at some way at time three, then either that researcher can behave as entailed or [and] there is no science, is[n't] there?
There you go. Simple.
Your 'argument' demonstrates nothing except that you can construct arguments that are self contradictory and mistake them for valid logic.