Posted: Aug 03, 2019 3:48 pm
ughaibu wrote:Okay, I got it. You're free will deniers for no reason that you can state, when you can't answer an argument you engage in mob tactics and misrepresentation, either that or you just don't understand the arguments. In any case, I think I have a satisfactory explanation for the free will denial on this site and there appears to be no possibility of getting any constructive feedback on anything I post, so, have a nice life.
There have been constructive responses here but you can’t even entertain the possibility that there is a problem with your argument so you ignore them and simply double down on the same mistakes you’ve been making since you revived this thread.
Let’s be clear here. I am not a denier or an asserter for either free will or determinism. I am on the fence but the emotional labour vs actual scientific evidence presented by the free will crowd makes me wonder what’s in it for likes of you to be so incredulous that you can’t even acknowledge responses to your hypothesis and respond in kind. Put aside your emotional investment in the subject (i.e Libertarian free will *MUST* be true) and engage with what is actually be written here.
I recommend as a starting point you read the paper New Older posted above then take it from there.