Posted: Jan 04, 2020 3:37 am
by Spinozasgalt
I get that this is a cosmological argument but...

If absolute chaos is an irrational or nonsensical concept, how can its contradictory in absolute order be sensical? And why don't you define the latter but move straight to what it entails? And where do you actually show why such and such is entailed? It seems like your use of phrases and words like "it would necesssarily entail" and "must" are just put in place of "and this is what I want my next conclusion to be" rather than leading reasonably, argumentatively, or logically from one point to the next.

Where is your reasoning about your concepts? As SAM said, you've got these big gaps.