Posted: Mar 23, 2020 11:32 am
Spearthrower wrote:Master Lawbringer wrote:
No, you didn't. You misintepreted what I meant with 'based on'. You think it means I equate them when I don't.
I just quoted you saying literally exactly that, so if I've "misinterpreted" it then the onus is absolutely on you to be a lot clearer in the presentation of your ideas because I am not the only one who has "misinterpreted" it. Of course, it is most likely because you're horribly confused which is why your ideas are so incoherent and contradictory.
Alternatively, neither myself nor the other people here really did "misinterpret" anything - you just went from absolute certain conviction of a bad idea to stating the opposite with exactly the same absolutely certain conviction, unaware that you did so, and unable to notice that your confidence is massively outstripping your ability.
No, you didn't. I never equate them. I have always said : 'based on'. Not : They are the same.
That whole equivocation argument is simply false. It's an oversimplification, hence a strawman.