Posted: Mar 24, 2020 3:38 am
Master Lawbringer wrote:Spearthrower wrote:Master Lawbringer wrote:
No, you didn't. I never equate them. I have always said : 'based on'. Not : They are the same.
That whole equivocation argument is simply false. It's an oversimplification, hence a strawman.
Your entire argument is equivocation. You have not always said 'based on'. As I literally cited in the post you're supposedly replying to.
And yeah, chucking the word 'strawman' at every response isn't helping you out of your dire confusion.
I never said 'they are the same' and I gave lots of examples that show that I don't mean that at all. So you're oversimplifying my argument. Strawman.
As I've already said: you clearly don't know what the term 'strawman' means. Oversimplification isn't a strawman.
You gave no examples of having written it before - you changed your argument.