Posted: Dec 16, 2020 8:02 am
by Cito di Pense
Frozenworld wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:
Frozenworld wrote:does it make it fair to say that there is no such thing as color or sound then?


Organisms have sensory receptor cells to handle information from the environment external to the organism. Unless you want to spring some form of creationism on us, this seems a point you should not be expected to contest. If your understanding of biology is so rudimentary that you are asking questions such as you just did, you need to educate yourself further before trying to engage a mature audience in some sort of discussion. My response is telling you not to concern yourself with the names of colors unless your interest is in communicating with artists and other people who work with colors. Naming a color is just a very elaborate repsponse to a stimulus in the environment of an organism. Likewise for sound, where you'd concern yourself with the names given to sounds by people with training in music. No such thing? Does everything have to be a 'thing'?


That's not even close to what I am saying. Most people don't even know that color only exists in their heads or that sound is just a pressure wave and only exists to biological creatures. Outside our heads there is no sound or color.


So what? You'd have to believe our heads were actually components of a significant argument to go along the line you're on. You don't have the merest clue how to make that argument.

Not being close to what you're saying is to be far away from the idiocy you're writing. So, no, it's not fair to say there's no such thing as sound or color. This is because you have such a crude understanding of how to use the word 'thing'.