rationalskepticism.org

Greg the Grouper wrote:

Frozenworld wrote:If evidence is meant to be testable then you have none for an external and objective reality then because everything is just sensory data and might not exist outside of you.

What do you think the terms "observable" and "testable" mean?

He's just attempted to render false the mountains of empirical evidence contrary to his position.

Imagine believing in something so stupid that you have to pretend that evidence cannot even exist to contradict your utterly inane belief system.

And supposedly, FW's gone from skepticism about solipsism, to frothing fundie just within a few months.