rationalskepticism.org

Audley Strange wrote:

Nocterro wrote:
1)
There exists a necessary being with properties including, but not necessarily limited to, perfect freedom, omnipotence, omniscience, perfect goodness, who caused the beginning of the existence of contingent things.

2)
If P does A freely, then no cause makes him do A. He is ultimately responsible for A being done; for nothing makes him make A be done.

3)
A person P is omnipotent at a time t if and only if he is able to bring about the existence of any logically contingent state of affairs x after t, the description of the occurrence of which does not entail that P did not bring it about at t, given that he does not believe that he has overriding reason for refraining from bringing about x.

4)
A person P is omniscient at time t if and only if he knows every true proposition about t or an earlier time and every true proposition about a time later than t which is true of logical necessity or which he has overriding reason to make true, which it is logically possible that he entertains then.

5)
A person P is perfectly good if P is so constituted that he always does what there is overriding reason to do, and always refrains from doing what there is overriding reason for not doing.

*edited for punctuation*

Ohhh nice. Okay...

1. Perfect Freedom and perfect Goodness are meaningless.

2. Plain nonsense.

3. Any description of a person as omnipotent is a stretch to say the least, to consider what he believes is utterly meaningless.

4. True is meaningless.

5 (see one)

Really you would have been better with "Magic superman who created it all".