Posted: Apr 03, 2018 8:55 pm
Yeah, it's an interesting supposition, I can see what you mean. Sorry I couldn't be helpful.
I think historically there are statistics of significantly higher rates of men who have 0 children compared to women (I say that, but I'm a bit concerned that sociological factors might overlook deaths in first child birth, which are hugely common in humans historically). You might try looking for data on that as well, if it seems relevant to your interest. And you may have more success there.
I think historically there are statistics of significantly higher rates of men who have 0 children compared to women (I say that, but I'm a bit concerned that sociological factors might overlook deaths in first child birth, which are hugely common in humans historically). You might try looking for data on that as well, if it seems relevant to your interest. And you may have more success there.