Posted: Jun 08, 2019 5:06 pm
GrahamH wrote:Although Plumreaches a different conclusion it could be that "women's sport" doesn't make much sense because "biological sex" or gender were only ever crude proxies for athletic ability.
Or it could be that the purpose of women's sport (and ignoring the other component premises here that could be questioned) was never to act as a crude proxy for athletic ability. And anything which presupposes that has gone wrong at the first.