rationalskepticism.org

Zwaarddijk wrote:

Agrippina wrote:Thank god you arrived. Please explain to seeker what his words mean, so we can move on!

The point about his questions being malformed still stands, though, to some extent.

OK. I don't mean to demean linguistics, I hope you understand that. I just don't understand why if he asks for the etymology, he asks for a definition. So please can you help out with the original question, if it makes sense to you that is. At least he did explain further on that he wasn't looking for a definition per se, but more for what you do.


(PS - and off topic - are you OK? Haven't seen you for ages? I don't get your blog updates either, are you still doing that?)[/off topic]