rationalskepticism.org

LucidFlight wrote:

John Platko wrote:

LucidFlight wrote:I guess if your behaviour does not adversely affect you, then it is not a disorder.

What if it adversely affects someone else?

Yes, good point. Let us expand the notion of "you" to include those around you. That could be an indicator of some sort of disorder that might need investigating.

I think that is covered by the definition I provided - ie it is not generally considered acceptable in local society to damage others.

ETA: Without their informed consent