Posted: Nov 08, 2022 3:10 pm
by Azaghal
Spearthrower wrote:
Azaghal wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Azaghal wrote:What can be done is extrapolating how he might react from known biographical details about the man, rather than what Spearthrower did, which was projecting his own psychological characteristics onto Tolkien.


Which empirically did not happen in the slightest as can be seen by what I actually wrote


OK. Why would Tolkien like RoP?


Uh how about you read what I already wrote and you supposedly replied to?

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/the-a ... l#p2792474


"I think Tolkien would love to see his work continue to mean something to future generation"

Which would be fine except that "his work" ≠ RoP.

Spearthrower wrote:I'll talk about what I like, when I like, but thanks for your kind suggestions.


Well I guess continuing to make creepy, perverted remarks is always an option.

Azaghal wrote:Except that Business Insider, for example, doesn't present any evidence that supports your repeated claim that RoP is 'bombing'.




Screenshot_2022-11-08_10-02-26.png


Screenshot_2022-11-08_10-02-26.png (371.18 KiB) Viewed 740 times





(Look everyone! It's Mary Sue Galadriel!)



Screenshot_2022-11-08_10-06-23.png


Screenshot_2022-11-08_10-06-23.png (32.82 KiB) Viewed 740 times





...and this is coming from a mainstream news article written by someone who claimed that any griping about black Dwarves being needlessly shoehorned into the series despite their two bases in Tolkien's work is just motivated by "racism".

I can guarantee that season 2 is going to be even funnier than the current shitshow.