Posted: Apr 22, 2011 6:14 pm
There is also a position that the so-called "art" is a social construct and does not exist in reality. In this sense, there is no art and pseudo-art, but only those who like to distinguish them as such.
Maybe a question to ask would be: What is the point of labeling something as art, pseudo-art respectively? What is it for?
But for that we would have to ask the first cavewo/man who made that distinction I guess, distinction between normal and abnormal.
Maybe a question to ask would be: What is the point of labeling something as art, pseudo-art respectively? What is it for?
But for that we would have to ask the first cavewo/man who made that distinction I guess, distinction between normal and abnormal.