Posted: Apr 23, 2011 12:45 am
I agree, anything, fitting that definition, can be art given the right conditions, which pretty much sums up what art is. Then asking : Is this art? and answering: Under the right conditions .. is like asking: What is the speed of light in vacuum? and answering: In vacuum ...
edit: Was not aware I was being asked.
The monkey, and deliberately in the definition gotta be questioned.
edit: Was not aware I was being asked.
Nicko wrote: The thing is: the monkey is not an artist, yet the paintings can be considered art. Who is the artist?
The monkey, and deliberately in the definition gotta be questioned.